Re: My AI's from 7-9-09 Meeting

Hi Russell,

> Reg’d IM 315 --  I thought the committee agreed to work to close this 
> one by editing out mentions of any “task” syntax?

I think we did for the first 2.0 draft.  That is, we deferred tasks
for later consideration.  For 2.1 it was requested by Cadence, I
think, that we add non-time consuming tasks.  The ultimate goal would
be to also support time consuming tasks, but neither Cadence nor
Mentor was willing to entertain that idea.

Per


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.