Re: Progress report

From: <john.aynsley@doulos.com>
Date: Wed May 05 2010 - 06:13:39 PDT

Hiroshi-san,

Good idea. I will consider what can reasonably be done.

John A

From:
Hiroshi Imai <hiroshi3.imai@toshiba.co.jp>
To:
john.aynsley@doulos.com
Cc:
sofie_vandeputte@yahoo.com, stanleyk@cadence.com,
systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Date:
28/04/2010 01:47
Subject:
Re: Progress report

John,

The new LRM will include man changes from minor issues to enhancements.
Categorizing its changes is very useful when we review its draft. Do
you have a plan to prepare such document?

Categorizing is like this:
  (1) Makes clear ambiguity in the current LRM.
  (2) Corrects error in the current LRM.
  (3) Changes definition in the current LRM.
      (3-1) Needs to rewrite the existing models, but their behaviors
            are same.
      (3-2) Needs to rewrite the existing models, also their behaviors
            change.
  (4) Enhancement (new syntax)

Best regards,
Hiroshi Imai
Chair of SystemC WG, JEITA
http://www.jeita-edatc.com/

At 09 Apr 2010 13:50:33 +0100 john.aynsley@doulos.com wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I am now going on vacation for a week, so thought I would send a quick
> progress report.
>
> I have already fixed 31 minor issues, which leaves 24 minor issues and 8

> enhancement requests remaining (approximately). Of the 24+8 outstanding
> issues, 8 of these are already being discussed on the reflector. So,
> numerically speaking, we have reached the half-way point, but this is
> misleading because we still have to handle some major enhancement
requests
> (such as the process control extensions).
>
> I have written up the majority of the new text for TLM-1, and am
currently
> working on tlm_fifo.
>
> Sofie has updated the LRM with the results of fixing these 31 minor
> issues, and we are currently reviewing the changes.
>
> John A
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed May 5 06:14:10 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 05 2010 - 06:14:14 PDT