John,
The new LRM will include man changes from minor issues to enhancements.
Categorizing its changes is very useful when we review its draft. Do
you have a plan to prepare such document?
Categorizing is like this:
(1) Makes clear ambiguity in the current LRM.
(2) Corrects error in the current LRM.
(3) Changes definition in the current LRM.
(3-1) Needs to rewrite the existing models, but their behaviors
are same.
(3-2) Needs to rewrite the existing models, also their behaviors
change.
(4) Enhancement (new syntax)
Best regards,
Hiroshi Imai
Chair of SystemC WG, JEITA
http://www.jeita-edatc.com/
At 09 Apr 2010 13:50:33 +0100 john.aynsley@doulos.com wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I am now going on vacation for a week, so thought I would send a quick
> progress report.
>
> I have already fixed 31 minor issues, which leaves 24 minor issues and 8
> enhancement requests remaining (approximately). Of the 24+8 outstanding
> issues, 8 of these are already being discussed on the reflector. So,
> numerically speaking, we have reached the half-way point, but this is
> misleading because we still have to handle some major enhancement requests
> (such as the process control extensions).
>
> I have written up the majority of the new text for TLM-1, and am currently
> working on tlm_fifo.
>
> Sofie has updated the LRM with the results of fixing these 31 minor
> issues, and we are currently reviewing the changes.
>
> John A
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Apr 27 17:57:47 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 27 2010 - 17:57:50 PDT