John,
The new LRM will include man changes from minor issues to enhancements.
Categorizing its changes is very useful when we review its draft. Do
you have a plan to prepare such document?
Categorizing is like this:
  (1) Makes clear ambiguity in the current LRM.
  (2) Corrects error in the current LRM.
  (3) Changes definition in the current LRM.
      (3-1) Needs to rewrite the existing models, but their behaviors
            are same.
      (3-2) Needs to rewrite the existing models, also their behaviors
            change.
  (4) Enhancement (new syntax)
Best regards,
Hiroshi Imai
Chair of SystemC WG, JEITA
http://www.jeita-edatc.com/
At 09 Apr 2010 13:50:33 +0100 john.aynsley@doulos.com wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> I am now going on vacation for a week, so thought I would send a quick 
> progress report.
> 
> I have already fixed 31 minor issues, which leaves 24 minor issues and 8 
> enhancement requests remaining (approximately). Of the 24+8 outstanding 
> issues, 8 of these are already being discussed on the reflector. So, 
> numerically speaking, we have reached the half-way point, but this is 
> misleading because we still have to handle some major enhancement requests 
> (such as the process control extensions).
> 
> I have written up the majority of the new text for TLM-1, and am currently 
> working on tlm_fifo.
> 
> Sofie has updated the LRM with the results of fixing these 31 minor 
> issues, and we are currently reviewing the changes.
> 
> John A
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Apr 27 17:57:47 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 27 2010 - 17:57:50 PDT