reset_signal_is

All,

Bishnupriya raised the following point a while back:

The LRM specifies 2 signatures for reset_signal_is

  void reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool );
  void reset_signal_is( const sc_signal<bool>& , bool );

  (The process control extensions spec uses the above signatures)

The 4feb06 kit implements the following 2 signatures

   void reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& port, bool level );
   void reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& iface, bool level ); <---------- this is a superset of what the LRM says

Should the LRM be modified (in the future) to allow the superset that the 4feb06 kit allows?

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.