OK. I accept this. Must have missed the original discussion.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:53 AM, <john.aynsley@doulos.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> We deliberately did not do that because it would lead to 5 levels of
> numbering 10.2.3.4.5, which is just too many. We judged that the practical
> limit should be 4.
>
> John A
>
>
> From: David C Black <dcblack@xtreme-eda.com> To:
> systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org Date: 24/11/2010 14:41 Subject: Move all
> TLM topics under major section 10 TLM? Sent by:
> owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> I am thinking sections 10-18 should become 10.1-10.18 with 10 labeled as
> TLM or similar vein. Otherwise it makes the SystemC specification look a bit
> unbalanced in my mind.
>
> What do others think?
>
> David
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Nov 24 07:00:25 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 24 2010 - 07:00:28 PST