RE: TLM-2 changes - const methods

From: Stuart Swan <stuart@cadence.com>
Date: Fri Dec 03 2010 - 07:53:33 PST

I vote yes.
Thanks
Stuart

From: owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org [mailto:owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org] On Behalf Of john.aynsley@doulos.com
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 7:38 AM
To: systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Subject: TLM-2 changes - const methods

All,

Is everyone okay with making the first of Jerome's proposed changes?

- 14.2 "Initiator and target sockets": the classes tlm_base_initiator_socket_b and tlm_base_initiator_socket (as well as their target counterparts) are missing const versions of the methods:

virtual sc_core::sc_port_b<FW_IF> & get_base_port();
virtual BW_IF & get_base_interface();
virtual sc_core::sc_export<BW_IF> & get_base_export();


Please vote yes/no (or make other comments if you wish, of course)

Thanks,

John A

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Dec 3 07:53:56 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2010 - 07:53:58 PST