Re: TLM-2 changes - const methods

I vote yes.

On 12/3/10, Stuart Swan <stuart@cadence.com> wrote:
> I vote yes.
> Thanks
> Stuart
>
> From: owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
> [mailto:owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> john.aynsley@doulos.com
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 7:38 AM
> To: systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
> Subject: TLM-2 changes - const methods
>
> All,
>
> Is everyone okay with making the first of Jerome's proposed changes?
>
> - 14.2 "Initiator and target sockets": the classes
> tlm_base_initiator_socket_b and tlm_base_initiator_socket (as well as their
> target counterparts) are missing const versions of the methods:
>
> virtual sc_core::sc_port_b<FW_IF> & get_base_port();
> virtual BW_IF & get_base_interface();
> virtual sc_core::sc_export<BW_IF> & get_base_export();
>
>
> Please vote yes/no (or make other comments if you wish, of course)
>
> Thanks,
>
> John A
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.