Data pointer with TLM_IGNORE_COMMAND

All,

Personally, I accept Jerome's argument that allowing the GP data pointer to be null when the command is TLM_IGNORE_COMMAND would make more sense and would not cause any serious backward compatibility problems. A similar relaxation of the rules would apply to the GP data length attribute: we would allow it to be 0.  (Jerome has already given a detailed analysis on the reflector, which I will not repeat here.)

Do people agree? Votes please.

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.