John,
No issue with this one.
Bart
From: john.aynsley@doulos.com [mailto:john.aynsley@doulos.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 7:46 PM
To: jerome.cornet@st.com; systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org; Bart.Vanthournout@synopsys.COM
Subject: Data pointer with TLM_IGNORE_COMMAND
All,
Personally, I accept Jerome's argument that allowing the GP data pointer to be null when the command is TLM_IGNORE_COMMAND would make more sense and would not cause any serious backward compatibility problems. A similar relaxation of the rules would apply to the GP data length attribute: we would allow it to be 0. (Jerome has already given a detailed analysis on the reflector, which I will not repeat here.)
Do people agree? Votes please.
Thanks,
John A
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Dec 6 02:04:39 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 06 2010 - 02:04:49 PST