RE: TLM extensions - status

From: Bart Vanthournout [mailto:Bart.Vanthournout@synopsys.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:57 AM
To: john.aynsley@doulos.com; Philipp A. Hartmann
Cc: Stuart Swan; Bart Vanthournout; Jerome CORNET; stanleyk@cadence.com; P1666 Technical WG
Subject: RE: TLM extensions - status


>>What if we put in a rule that requires to reset this new flag whenever you use it? In this case a new initiator that wants to use the additional >>attributes would be required to ‘clean-up’ after the debug or DMI call.

>>I still think the extension approach is better, but if we want to land in the next couple of days we’ll have to be very practical.

Agreed with Bart on this point (except on the fact that the extension approach is better of course ;-)).


Jerome

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.