RE: Outstanding TLM-2.0 issue re transport_dbg...

From: Jerome CORNET <jerome.cornet@st.com>
Date: Tue Jan 18 2011 - 08:16:16 PST

John,

my own opinion on this topic was(and still is) to return a count including the disabled bytes.

Regards,

Jerome

From: owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org [mailto:owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org] On Behalf Of john.aynsley@doulos.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:05 PM
To: systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Subject: Outstanding TLM-2.0 issue re transport_dbg...

All,

Opinions please on the following issue...

Jerome,

In the case of debug transport with byte enables, when transport_dbg returns the count of bytes actually read or written, do you want the count to include or to exclude any disabled bytes (assuming the target supports the full payload)?

Thanks,

John A

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John,

in my opinion, it will be simpler for everyone if the count includes the disabled bytes.
But I am open to other opinions on this topic.

Thanks,

Jerome

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jan 18 08:17:37 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 18 2011 - 08:17:39 PST