RE: Outstanding TLM-2.0 issue re transport_dbg...

In the absence of any other opinions, I will make that clear in the LRM.

John A

From:
Jerome CORNET <jerome.cornet@st.com>
To:
"john.aynsley@doulos.com" <john.aynsley@doulos.com>,
"systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org" <systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org>
Date:
18/01/2011 16:17
Subject:
RE: Outstanding TLM-2.0 issue re transport_dbg...

John,
 
my own opinion on this topic was(and still is) to return a count including
the disabled bytes.
 
Regards,
 
Jerome
 
 
From: owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org [
mailto:owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org] On Behalf Of
john.aynsley@doulos.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:05 PM
To: systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Subject: Outstanding TLM-2.0 issue re transport_dbg...
 
All,

Opinions please on the following issue...

Jerome,

In the case of debug transport with byte enables, when transport_dbg
returns the count of bytes actually read or written, do you want the count
to include or to exclude any disabled bytes (assuming the target supports
the full payload)?

Thanks,

John A

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John,

in my opinion, it will be simpler for everyone if the count includes the
disabled bytes.
But I am open to other opinions on this topic.

Thanks,

Jerome

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.