Subject: RE: Confusing Example in LRM
From: Bakalar, Kenneth (kenneth_bakalar@mentorg.com)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 11:45:18 PST
IEEE rules do not permit the use of examples as part of a definition. That
is to say, the examples are not normative -- they are only in the nature of
comments. It is important to guarantee that the text describes the general
case unambiguously.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 [mailto:Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 1:27 PM
To: verilog-ams@eda.org
Subject: Confusing Example in LRM
[8.10.6 Connect module example using driver access functions
http://www.eda.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/tc-docs/lrm/2.0/mixedsig.html#82297
0]
The diagram shows a module "e2c" which is not mentioned, and the text
describes
"c2e" which is not shown.
I would suggest doing two diagrams: one showing the circuit described by
the user, and one showing the circuit as seen by the simulator with the
D2As connecting into the analog domain and the A2D providing the
resolved value to d2.
Kev.
-- National Semiconductor 2900 Semiconductor Drive, Mail Stop D3-677, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8090
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 11:49:41 PST