Subject: RE: Confusing Example in LRM
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 13:10:43 PST
> From: "Bakalar, Kenneth" <kenneth_bakalar@mentorg.com>
>
> IEEE rules do not permit the use of examples as part of a definition. That
> is to say, the examples are not normative -- they are only in the nature of
> comments. It is important to guarantee that the text describes the general
> case unambiguously.
A picture is worth a thousand words (?)
As it's just an example it should probably be in an appendix anyway, but I
think we need more (better) examples rather fewer.
BTW, is Mentor developing it's own Verilog-AMS or OEMing somebody else's?
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 13:15:30 PST