Subject: RE: net_resolution (second iteration)
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 12:57:00 PST
> From imw@antrim.com Tue Feb 27 10:40:40 2001
>
> The mixed net has been split into three components. Perhaps
> the clearest way to have desribed this would to have had a
> 3-terminal connect module:
>
> module wire_with_electrical(d_in, d_out, a_io)
> input d_in; wire d_in;
> output d_out; wire d_out;
> inout a_io; electrical a_io;
> endmodule
>
> This would make it evident that 'something' has to read d_in
> and drive d_out, for example.
>
> --ian
You're right, it makes it more obvious to the users what's going on.
It probably works better if you have to do manual A/D insertion or
independent CM characterization too.
Gets my vote, but can we have "d_out" as the last port?
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Feb 27 2001 - 13:01:18 PST