Subject: Re: Electronic Issue List - Steve Grout inputs
From: Steve Grout (grouts@flash.net)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2001 - 19:39:34 PDT
Sorry, this filtering didn't work very well for me, as I
gave everything a '1'.
I feel all of these issues need to be addressed:
All the LRM weaknesses need to be eliminated,
and all the fixes and those labeled
'ENH' enhancements in my view and experience still are needed,
or at the very least objectively worked on by this technical
team.
There is still the overall issue of scope of any/all of these
changes that I believe still needs addressed, e.g., looking at
these individual issues from the POV what overall will they
achieve.
I understand the basic scope of LRM cleanup, but there
are even there issues/proposals that, in my technical view, can
not be avoided, if the LRM and Verilog-AMS is to really support
the technology that the users are trying to use this language
and its simulators for. With that in mind, I would be glad
to agree with a multi-phase set up of change groups, where
we would still know what later will be added/fixed, and where
we can objectively identify what the current limitations
and risks are with each phase. With that approach, we should
still make every effort to resolve all issues in our nearterm
changes to the LRM that deal with clarifications and fixing
grammar, etc.
Regards,
--Steve Grout
CAD Methodologist, Architect, Manager, Individual Contributor -
CAD System, Database, Flows, Tools, Integration, and Support
for both digital and Analog/Mixed-Signal.
101 Kenneil Court
Apex, NC 27502
Phone: 919-303-5066
email: grouts@flash.net
http://www.flash.net/~sgrout/Personal/resume2001.txt (or doc,rtf,pdf)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Aug 07 2001 - 20:44:19 PDT