Subject: Re: auto insertion of interface elements
From: Kevin Cameron (dkc@galaxy.nsc.com)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 12:06:49 PST
Peter Liebmann wrote:
> >> Note that the load split case is the same as the merge since it does not
> make sense to split disciplines of different thresholds
>
> >I'm not sure I understand that - isn't the reverse true.
>
> Sorry, typo. I meant to say
>
> Note that the load split case is the same as the merge since it does not make
> sense to split disciplines of having the same threshold.
>
> I can explain this in more detail if needed.
Mostly you would do split if the the receiver is actually a load, i.e. it has parasitics
that need to be connected locally.
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Dec 06 2001 - 12:01:52 PST