Subject: RE: Updated scheduling chapter.
From: Martin O'Leary (oleary@cadence.com)
Date: Mon Jul 22 2002 - 17:57:26 PDT
Kev,
here is my feedback on this proposal.
Thanks,
--Martin
Section 9:
9.2.2 Introduction
* I'm fine with this change
9.2.2.1
* I'm fine with this change
9.2.2.2
* Re second line
"predicate" should be "predict"
* Re third line
"a a" should be "a"
* Re second paragraph
suggest you use another term other than "crossings"
so as to be more generic and in order to
account for @timer.
* Re final paragraph
Disagree with your statement that analog block
should not be implicitly sensitive to digital signals.
Implicit sensitivity of the analog block to digital
signals is consistent with the way the analog
block handles analog signals - it is implicity
sensitive to these.
Implicit sensitivity is more user friendly as it
makes it easy to write mixed signal modules - you
don't need to have so many '@' statements or an
event sensitivity list.
9.2.2.3
* Re: rounding vs truncation
- Concerned about redefining the existing behavior
as it is damaging to credibility of the standard to
do things like this.
- Cannot agree to this change unless impact on VHDL-AMS
co-simulation is determined.
- I will consult with other people here on this.
figure 9-3
* fine with this change.
9.2.3 - 9.2.4 being deleted
* have a problem with this - found these
sections helpful - don't see any value in deleting them.
Thanks,
--Martin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Cameron x3251 [mailto:Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:28 AM
> To: Verilog-AMS Reflector
> Subject: Updated scheduling chapter.
>
>
>
> I've attached an updated version of the A/D Scheduling Chapter.
> It's in MIF format from FrameMaker 7.0 - our sysadmins have deleted
> the 6.X Version.
>
> If you have trouble unpacking it I can post a PDF.
>
> Kev.
>
> --
> National Semiconductor
> 2900 Semiconductor Drive, Mail Stop D3-500, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8090
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jul 22 2002 - 18:09:04 PDT