V-AMS Compact Modeling Extensions subcommittee
Minutes of April 6, 2004
Attendees:
Geoffrey Coram, Analog Devices
Ilya Yusim, Cadence
Colin McAndrew, Motorola
Srikanth Chandrasekaran, Motorola
David Zweidinger, Texas Instruments
Peter Liebmann, Xpedion
Jim Barby, U Waterloo
Chris Nicklaw, Silvaco
Al Davis, Kettering U
1) Approval of previous minutes
2) Approval process for LRM 2.2
We had a brief discussion of the process by which the proposed
extensions would be approved as AMS LRM 2.2
- I will update LRM frame document and send it to the full
AMS committee as well as other Accellera TCC chairs
- May want another meeting of the main AMS committee to discuss,
similar to the meeting in January
- I will plan to present this at the Accellera board meeting
that we expect will happen in June during DAC; Jim noted that
answering the board's questions in real time will accelerate
the process
- Formal submission to the board will follow, after I address
any concerns; I will not try to have the LRM ready in May
(which would be necessary to have a vote on it at DAC)
Sri said that our subcommittee should focus on Verilog-A, and
not worry about the SystemVerilog integration; this is an
issue he has already addressed with Vassilios.
3) Limiting
Sri wants to see UDFs (user-defined functions) allowed for limiting.
I had taken it out as giving a model writer too much rope to hang
him/herself. However, Spice does not have a temperature limiting
algorithm, and some simulators (eg, zspice that works with ADMS)
may not have any limiting algorithms built in; this would give
users a way to do the limiting. (In e-mail after the call, but
before the minutes, Sri and I discussed that the simulator would
search for the limiting_identifier as a built-in function, then
in the module's analog functions; that way, a diode could have a
simple pnjlim UDF for distribution, but the simulator's own
(presumably enhanced) pnjlim would take precedence.)
We think that $discontinuity(-1) would be a reasonable way to signal
simulator that another iteration is required.
4) M factor
We considered pre-defining "parameter real mfactor = 1"
for every module, but Sri pointed out that this is a nuisance
for parameter overrides by ordered list.
We believe that the simulator should handle the four main rules
- current contribs scaled by m
- current probes scaled by 1/m
- noise currents scaled by sqrt(m)
- noise voltages scaled by 1/sqrt(m)
OOMRs may be handled according to rules in the proposal.
However, we think we should provide access to $mfactor in the
module, for minr, output parameters, and mismatch.
For the case of minr and output parameters, the simulator
should be able to determine that the use of $mfactor is OK;
output parameters should not affect the contributions, and
minr uses it to switch formulations entirely.
However, the simulator will probably need to generate a warning
for the use of $mfactor in mismatch equations, since it won't be
clear that the model writer isn't trying to do manual m-scaling.
Ilya mentioned a customer wanted m=0 for some reason.
Colin said we should insist that the $mfactor as seen by module
will be > 0 (strict); simulator may choose to accept $mfactor=0,
but it should not instantiate the device.
For Spice netlists, in which an mfactor is defined, usually as
an instance parameter "m=<value>", if the device is instantiated
as a Verilog-A primitive, then the simulator should:
a) follow the four simple rules as above
b) set the value of $mfactor to <value> (times whatever
hierarchical value is appropriate)
However, we got hung up trying to define a syntax for specifying
mfactor in a Verilog netlist.
5) Next meeting: 9AM Eastern (Daylight) Time, April 20
3PM Eastern is 4:30AM Australia, so we're moving back to mornings
(9AM EDT is 10:30PM for Sri). This is great for the Europeans,
but a nuisance for West Coasters. Sorry.
-Geoffrey
-- Geoffrey J. Coram, Ph.D. Senior CAD Engineer Analog Devices, Inc. Geoffrey.Coram@analog.com 804 Woburn St., MS-422, Tel (781) 937-1924 Wilmington, MA 01887 Fax (781) 937-1014Received on Fri Apr 9 14:28:20 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 09 2004 - 14:28:28 PDT