required parameters

From: Geoffrey.Coram <Geoffrey.Coram@analog.com>
Date: Fri May 21 2004 - 07:26:14 PDT

Actually, Kevin - removal of the default value from the syntax
(in the case where the range is specified) was considered
already, it's section 7.1 in the proposal document, and if
you read it, you'll see why we didn't like the idea of
"required parameters."

-Geoffrey

Kevin Cameron wrote:
>
> I don't think it would be a big battle since there is no backward-compatibility conflict, and it adds useful functionality for the user (they don't have to add code to check their parameter didn't get set, and less chance of accidental error). The two conflicting syntaxes for declaring ranges are more likely to be a problem.
Received on Fri May 21 07:26:19 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 21 2004 - 07:26:20 PDT