Well thats NOT the definition I learned in college, but in a world where any signal larger that 1 bit is a "vector" I suppose that could be true.. but a "real" is not a vector, even though a computer representation takes many bits. Jonathan David Mixed-Signal IC jbdavid@cadence.com Ph (408)894-2646 -----Original Message----- From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On Behalf Of Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 12:01 AM To: Helwig Graham-A11558 Cc: VerilogAMS Reflector Subject: scalar Just by the way, your 10.4.2 says, "The analog function declaration implicitly declares a scalar variable ... This variable either defaults to real or ..." I think this is an incorrect usage of "scalar". In 1364, "scalar" denotes a 1-bit value. A real is not a scalar. > Attached is an example of how I would go about merging the analog UDF definition into the 2001 UDF section. Shalom -- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com Design & Verification Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 5441478 [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential ProprietaryReceived on Wed Mar 2 11:58:37 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 02 2005 - 11:58:53 PST