RE: Call next week ?

Hi Sri,
 
 Unfortunately I have not started the new $table_model() definition document
yet. I should have an update within one month. My apologies for the
additional delay,
 
Regards,
 
Patrick  


________________________________

	From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org]
On Behalf Of Sri Chandra
	Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:02 PM
	To: Tamhankar Prasanna-A14507
	Cc: verilog-ams@eda.org
	Subject: Re: Call next week ?
	
	
	I apologize to all (especially prasanna since it looks like he was
the only one who dialed in) for completely forgetting about the call this
week and not organizing it.
	
	Patrick,
	Do you have any progress on the table_model that you could post to
be able to review?
	
	regards,
	Sri
	
	Tamhankar Prasanna-A14507 wrote: 

		Hi all, 

		Looks like I was the only one who dialled in yesterday for
LRM call ;-)  Sri is travelling at the moment so no reminders were sent,
anyway, how about call next week ( on 28th of June US date) ? The agenda
remains the same.

		Cheers, 
		Prasanna 
		------------------------------------------------------ 
		Prasanna Tamhankar 
		Freescale Semiconductors, Adelaide 
		+61 8 81683585 
		------------------------------------------------------ 

		> From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org 
		> [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On Behalf Of 
		> Chandrasekaran Srikanth-A12788 
		> Sent: Tuesday, 7 June 2005 5:28 PM 
		> To: 'VerilogAMS Reflector' 
		> Subject: LRM Committee Meeting for 7 June 2005 
		> 
		> 
		> 
		> Hi all, 
		> 
		> I plan to postpone the meeting scheduled for 7th June and 
		> have the next one on the 21st of June. The status of the 
		> following items are as follows: 
		> 
		> 1. AC, DCSweep MS proposal - Martin's feedback was
received 
		> just now. I don't think there is sufficient time for 
		> australia to analyse this before discussion tomorrow
morning 
		> (australian time). No further feedback on this. 
		> 
		> 2. Table_model proposal: No update on this. Current
Status: 
		> Requirements have been clarified (& frozen), waiting for
the 
		> updated proposal. 
		> 
		> 3. Migrating open issues to SV-AMS system: No update on
this, 
		> as far as I know, this hasn't yet been setup for
Verilog-AMS. 
		> I am thinking I will go ahead and just for the time being 
		> send out the spreadsheet format again which can be
discussed 
		> in the next call 
		> 
		> 4. Cadence SV-AMS Strawman proposal: No updates on this
yet. 
		> 
		> Regards, 
		> Sri 
		>