All, Have a question about usage of implicit nets in Verilog-AMS, can implicit nets be used in behavioral blocks ? AMS LRM section 3.4.5 says they can be used in structural descriptions, there are no restrictions on implicit net usage withing behavior block. Looks like in a pure digital module (no mixed signal), usage of always @(implicit_net) is actually allowed. However, this gets complicated in a mixed-signal module because the implicit net may either get resolved to be analog or digital, and doing always @(analog_implicit_net) is wrong even within a digital block. I have attached a simple module illustrating the issues below `include "disciplines.vams" `timescale 1ns/1ns //`default_nettype wire module testImplicitNets; reg d; wire dout; not #1 (implicitNet1, d); not #1 (implicitNet2 , implicitNet1); not #1 (dout , implicitNet2); initial begin #100 d = 0; #100 d = 1; #100 d = 0; #1 $finish; end always @( d ) $display( $time, "[DIGITAL]d toggled to \t", d ); always @( implicitNet1 or implicitNet2 ) $display( $time, "[DIGITAL]\t\t", implicitNet1, implicitNet2); analog begin // @( implicitNet1 or implicitNet2 ) $strobe("[ANALOG]\t\t", implicitNet1, implicitNet2); @(implicitNet1) $strobe("[ANALOG]implicitNet1 toggled at time = %g!\n", $abstime); end endmodule Cheers, Prasanna ------------------------------------------------------ Prasanna Tamhankar Freescale Semiconductors, Adelaide +61 8 81683585 ------------------------------------------------------Received on Thu Aug 25 23:32:25 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 25 2005 - 23:33:32 PDT