Hi, >>2) In 2005, to be consistent with other keyword pairs should >"`begin_keywords" and "`end_keywords" be replaced with >"`keywords" and "`endkeywords"? >> >> >Wonder what it is in P1800. I would guess it would be similar >to 1364. >In that case probably we should be consistent with the digital >standard. >With this version of the language we want to eliminate any of >the >inconsistencies between the standards. [Shalom: ] 1364 and 1800 are coordinated. This particular directive was originally proposed as part of 1800 and in the end moved to be part of 1364, which is the basis of 1800, so it is included by reference in 1800. As for the exact names of these directives, they are no longer subject to change as they have already been approved by ballot. I don't remember why these names were chosen, maybe to emphasize their nested nature. >>3) '\n' has been added to end of the syntax for each >directive. [Shalom: ] This assumes that each directive may not be followed by additional text on the same line. While it is true for `define and a couple of others, I am not sure it is true for all. We did discuss this in 1364. I think we did not want to require this in order not to make illegal existing legacy code. ShalomReceived on Fri Sep 30 06:38:25 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 30 2005 - 06:39:17 PDT