I guess, a variable needs to be used if you want to retain the value rather than doing it through the branch contributions, unlike we invent some kind of new syntax. However i am not fully convinced at the example where the branch needs to retain the value. Geoffrey.Coram wrote: > Sri - > Indeed, I do believe that the user expected the branch to retain > the last value. > > -Geoffrey > > > Sri Chandra wrote: >> Goeffrey, >> >> I just looked at your bugnote in the mantis item 815 with the following >> example: >> >> @(cross(V(clk)) begin >> V(out) <+ V(in); >> end >> >> and in this case when the clock is not transitioning you dont want an >> open circuit. Does the user expect the branch 'out' to just retain the >> last value when the clock is not transitioning? I can see the use of >> flow of zero in the case of event not firing being useful in initial >> step. Not sure what usage is expected in the case of other events like >> cross and timer. >> >> cheers, >> Sri > -- Srikanth Chandrasekaran DTO, Tools Group Freescale Semiconductors Inc. Ph: +61-(0)8-8168 3592 Fax: x3201Received on Mon Apr 17 20:16:20 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 17 2006 - 20:16:27 PDT