All, I apologize for missing the call this morning. It turns out that Thursday mornings are just too busy for me to attend. I have updated the document to include an model that patterns the desired behavior. You can find the updated version at http://designers-guide.org/private/vams-extensions/idt-issue.pdf Also, I would like to offer the use the my online forum for use by the Verilog-AMS committee. We used it when defining the compact model extensions and I found it to be a very convenient way to carrying on the conversations about particular issues. It naturally separates the discussion threads and makes them easy to follow. If you wanted to do this, I would give you a private board, so only invitees would be allowed to see the board or contribute. -Ken Geoffrey.Coram wrote: > Resending for Ken Kundert; original message bounced (too long). > Attachment has been saved as > http://www.verilog.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/public-docs/idt-issue.pdf > > > ----------------- Original Message ------------- > All, > I'd like to join the meeting tomorrow and discuss the reset feature > of the idt function. I have not had much luck using this feature through > the years, and recently had a situation where I really needed it. > Unfortunately, I found the Cadence implementation unsuitable once again, > and when I dug in to it I found the LRM silent on critical aspects of > this feature. I have attached a very short document that illustrates the > issue and proposes what I believe to be the desirable behavior. If you > all agree I will work on coming up with the needed modifications to the LRM. > > -Ken
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 05 2006 - 15:24:55 PDT