Re: idt reset issue

Ken,

I haven't been able to attend the recent calls but I hope to be back 
online from this week onwards. I dont think this issue has been discused 
in the recent meetings. The committee has been reviewing independent 
chapters and we are currently in the process of reviewing chapter 7 
being edited by Marq Kole.

The last I remember in the reflector was you were planning to present 
this item to go over it to the committee but you were unable to attend 
the meeting. If you are available and if you can present the proposal at 
one of the the committee meetings that will be great and we can schedule 
it in one of the upcoming calls.

Regards,
Sri

Ken Kundert wrote:
> Sri,
>      Was there any decision made on the idt issue? Would you like me to
> a cut at refining the description of idt in the LRM to avoid the
> ambiguity in its behavior?
> 
> -Ken
> 
> Ken Kundert wrote:
>> All,
>>    I apologize for missing the call this morning. It turns out that
>> Thursday mornings are just too busy for me to attend.
>>
>> I have updated the document to include an model that patterns the
>> desired behavior. You can find the updated version at
>> http://designers-guide.org/private/vams-extensions/idt-issue.pdf
>>
>> Also, I would like to offer the use the my online forum for use by the
>> Verilog-AMS committee. We used it when defining the compact model
>> extensions and I found it to be a very convenient way to carrying on the
>> conversations about particular issues. It naturally separates the
>> discussion threads and makes them easy to follow. If you wanted to do
>> this, I would give you a private board, so only invitees would be
>> allowed to see the board or contribute.
>>
>> -Ken
>>
>>
>> Geoffrey.Coram wrote:
>>> Resending for Ken Kundert; original message bounced (too long).
>>> Attachment has been saved as
>>> http://www.verilog.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/public-docs/idt-issue.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------- Original Message -------------
>>> All,
>>>     I'd like to join the meeting tomorrow and discuss the reset feature
>>> of the idt function. I have not had much luck using this feature through
>>> the years, and recently had a situation where I really needed it.
>>> Unfortunately, I found the Cadence implementation unsuitable once again,
>>> and when I dug in to it I found the LRM silent on critical aspects of
>>> this feature. I have attached a very short document that illustrates the
>>> issue and proposes what I believe to be the desirable behavior. If you
>>> all agree I will work on coming up with the needed modifications to the LRM.
>>>
>>> -Ken

-- 
Srikanth Chandrasekaran
DTO Tools Development
Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
Ph: +91-120-439 7021 F: x5199