Re: idt reset issue

Sri,
    I have an on-going conflict that prevents me from calling into the
meetings. I have published a description of the problem and the desired
behavior. There has been some discussion on the reflector and nobody has
presented any objections. Perhaps I should just send out a proposed
change to the LRM and see what everyone thinks?

-Ken

Sri Chandra wrote:
> Ken,
> 
> I haven't been able to attend the recent calls but I hope to be back
> online from this week onwards. I dont think this issue has been discused
> in the recent meetings. The committee has been reviewing independent
> chapters and we are currently in the process of reviewing chapter 7
> being edited by Marq Kole.
> 
> The last I remember in the reflector was you were planning to present
> this item to go over it to the committee but you were unable to attend
> the meeting. If you are available and if you can present the proposal at
> one of the the committee meetings that will be great and we can schedule
> it in one of the upcoming calls.
> 
> Regards,
> Sri
> 
> Ken Kundert wrote:
>> Sri,
>>      Was there any decision made on the idt issue? Would you like me to
>> a cut at refining the description of idt in the LRM to avoid the
>> ambiguity in its behavior?
>>
>> -Ken
>>
>> Ken Kundert wrote:
>>> All,
>>>    I apologize for missing the call this morning. It turns out that
>>> Thursday mornings are just too busy for me to attend.
>>>
>>> I have updated the document to include an model that patterns the
>>> desired behavior. You can find the updated version at
>>> http://designers-guide.org/private/vams-extensions/idt-issue.pdf
>>>
>>> Also, I would like to offer the use the my online forum for use by the
>>> Verilog-AMS committee. We used it when defining the compact model
>>> extensions and I found it to be a very convenient way to carrying on the
>>> conversations about particular issues. It naturally separates the
>>> discussion threads and makes them easy to follow. If you wanted to do
>>> this, I would give you a private board, so only invitees would be
>>> allowed to see the board or contribute.
>>>
>>> -Ken
>>>
>>>
>>> Geoffrey.Coram wrote:
>>>> Resending for Ken Kundert; original message bounced (too long).
>>>> Attachment has been saved as
>>>> http://www.verilog.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/public-docs/idt-issue.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------- Original Message -------------
>>>> All,
>>>>     I'd like to join the meeting tomorrow and discuss the reset feature
>>>> of the idt function. I have not had much luck using this feature
>>>> through
>>>> the years, and recently had a situation where I really needed it.
>>>> Unfortunately, I found the Cadence implementation unsuitable once
>>>> again,
>>>> and when I dug in to it I found the LRM silent on critical aspects of
>>>> this feature. I have attached a very short document that illustrates
>>>> the
>>>> issue and proposes what I believe to be the desirable behavior. If you
>>>> all agree I will work on coming up with the needed modifications to
>>>> the LRM.
>>>>
>>>> -Ken
>