Re: paramset resolution

From: Geoffrey.Coram <Geoffrey.Coram_at_.....>
Date: Fri Dec 15 2006 - 12:15:32 PST
Kevin Cameron wrote:
> 
> Geoffrey.Coram wrote:
> >
> > I think that's right: if you didn't specify all the connections,
> > then you're content with a less-accurate -- and presumably faster! --
> > model.
> >
> I prefer to have things "fail safe", i.e. default to the behavior that's
> least likely to be wrong (use the accurate model).
> 
> Bad silicon is expensive. As a user you don't want tools making the
> wrong assumptions for you.
> > Eg, if you don't specify the substrate connection of a bipolar,
> > you're content with a 3-terminal model.
> >

If you didn't specify the substrate connection, then it's a
bad idea to select a model with 4 terminals -- what happens
with the 4th terminal?  I would say it's correct to choose
the 3-terminal model, if one is available.  If you want to
make sure the most accurate models are used, then there
shouldn't be a 3-terminal model available!

-Geoffrey
Received on Fri Dec 15 12:15:39 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 15 2006 - 12:15:50 PST