RE: multiple analog blocks

Are you guys really disagreeing with each other?

Shalom

> Dave Miller wrote:
> > Kevin Cameron wrote:
> >>> With this we could then simply use constant functions and then we
> >>> have a ready to go method to perform complex pre-simulation
> >>> initialisation.
> >>
> >> What's telling the compiler it's a constant function, and does it
> >> have to be?
> >
> > Any analog user defined function who's arguments are constant
> > (parameters, numbers) is a constant function, as they can be solved
> > pre-simulation with no dependencies on a matrix etc.
> > I would love to see more use of constant analog functions, if only
as
> > an alternative to users writing function macro's to do the same
thing.
> > As with all macro's in any language, debugging them can sometimes be
a
> > challenge.
> I don't see the need for the function to be a constant or analog if it
> is just being used for initialization and is not inside an analog
block.