In 3.2.2. you say a new keyword (concatenate) is preferable, that is not true: creating a new keyword removes that name from the those available for variables and creates backward compatibility issues - i.e. existing keywords cannot be variable names, so reuse will not cause clashes. I still think that concatenation should be done using the block name to avoid ambiguity, that helps if you want to do a bunch of disjoint stuff in a generate, e.g.: genarate ... always @ () ... // digital thing analog continue thermal begin ... // analog model analog continue elec begin ... // another analog model endgenerate - should give you separate thermal and elec blocks (allowing multi-rate simulation). I would make the block name mandatory. Kev. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Apr 5 10:22:21 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 05 2007 - 10:22:25 PDT