Re: feedback

From: Marq Kole <marq.kole_at_.....>
Date: Wed Apr 18 2007 - 02:49:32 PDT

Kevin Cameron <kevin@sonicsinc.com> wrote on 18-04-2007 01:57:59:

<snip>


> The switches in a wired-or would all be switch branches (potential 0, or
> open). Multiple potential 0 contributions in parallel are not a problem
> physically, but if the voltage is calculated dynamically you can't
> statically analyze the case.

<snip>
 
> If putting modules with simple switches and ideal batteries in parallel
> works OK then I won't have a problem.

But this is not allowed in the current Verilog-AMS standard either if you were to implement it using parallel instances of switches. The ability to handle multiple analog blocks is not going to change this behavior because that is not its aim.

If you can convince the Verilog-AMS committee to support this for parallel switch instances then it will automatically work for multiple analog blocks, but it is independent of the multiple analog blocks proposal! And vice versa, if there are reasonable arguments not to allow this for parallel switch instances, then the same will apply to multiple analog blocks.

Marq

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. Received on Wed Apr 18 02:48:43 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 18 2007 - 02:48:52 PDT