Geoffrey, > I will also note that "equivalent type" isn't necessary; one could > have coercion (real to integer or vice-versa). Perhaps, though, > we should say something about strings. [SB] The type equivalence requirement for an unpacked array assignment comes from 1800. This requirement is stronger than assignment compatibility. Shalom -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Apr 19 04:32:08 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 19 2007 - 04:32:11 PDT