Hi Geoffrey, But, when I trace event_expression, it never makes it into the analog domain. I cant see where analog_event_expression makes it into the expression or analog_expression item. But I will search again, maybe I am missing something. I think we had analog_event_expression to separate cross/timer/above (which are valid in digital) from initial_step and final_step (which are only valid in analog. I guess we can do it semantically, but it seems to be easier to restrict it via the syntax itself. Cheers... Dave Geoffrey.Coram wrote: > analog_event_functions are part of the BNF for "event_expression" > > I'd have to look deeper to understand why analog_event_expression > is still a separate syntax item, rather than being merged and > having the restrictions expressed semantically. > > -Geoffrey > > > > David Miller wrote: >> Hi Graham, >> In section 6.5 of the BNF, you have added analog_event_functions for >> cross, timer, and above. >> However you don't have that rule in analog_event_expression. >> >> In analog_event_expression I think there should be a rule for >> | analog_event_functions >> >> Cheers... >> Dave >> > -- ===================================== -- David Miller -- Design Technology (Austin) -- Freescale Semiconductor -- Ph : 512 996-7377 Fax: x7755 ===================================== -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Aug 20 09:35:57 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:36:04 PDT