transition time_tol

From: Paul Floyd <Paul_Floyd_at_.....>
Date: Tue Sep 25 2007 - 08:31:21 PDT
Hi

Table 4.15 (2.3 draft, Table 4.23 in the 2.2 LRM) does not include the 
time_tol of transition() (and there is no equivalent of Syntax 6-11, 
e.g., for cross(), which indicates which arguments are 
analog_expressions and which are constant_expressions).

I guess that it should be a contant_expression.

Is this an omission from Table 4.15, or did I miss this elsewhere in the 
LRM?

Regards
Paul Floyd
-- 
Dr Paul Floyd
Mentor Graphics Corporation


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Sep 25 08:31:40 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 25 2007 - 08:32:07 PDT