Hi Paul, to stay consistent with cross and timer, I think it should be constant. I can add it to the table in Chapter 4. But from the simulator's point of view, there is no reason why it (or the tolerances for cross and timer) have to be constant as far as I can tell. But probably best to leave them as constant for LRM 2.3. Cheers... Dave Paul Floyd wrote: > Hi > > Table 4.15 (2.3 draft, Table 4.23 in the 2.2 LRM) does not include the > time_tol of transition() (and there is no equivalent of Syntax 6-11, > e.g., for cross(), which indicates which arguments are > analog_expressions and which are constant_expressions). > > I guess that it should be a contant_expression. > > Is this an omission from Table 4.15, or did I miss this elsewhere in the > LRM? > > Regards > Paul Floyd -- ===================================== -- David Miller -- Design Technology (Austin) -- Freescale Semiconductor -- Ph : 512 996-7377 Fax: x7755 ===================================== -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 25 08:54:55 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 25 2007 - 08:55:02 PDT