Marq, I agree it should be there just in one place - not sure why it slipped out from our earlier document changes. If the solution is just simple enough - to remove section 2.6.3 and 3.2.1 then i guess it should be simple enough and don't expect any impact to schedule. However, I will let Stu comment on this. The plan is to have draft3 that can we start reviewing on March 13th, which ideally i don't want to delay. cheers, Sri Marq Kole wrote: > Hi All, > > It seems that the issue mentioned below is still present in Draft 2 of > the 2.3 LRM. Currently the same text on real-to-integer conversion is > present in the following sections: > - section 2.6.3 > - section 3.2.1 > - section 4.2.1.1 > > An earlier reply by David Miller suggested to have this text only at > section 4.2.1.1 and that all other texts should refer to that section. I > have no preference only that it should occur just once and others should > refer. Can we include this change in Draft 3? > > Cheers, > Marq > > > owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org wrote on 16-10-2007 15:21:42: > > > All, > > > > And the same text is also present in subsection 4.1.1.1 - do we > > really need to hammer this home? :-) > > > > Cheers, > > Marq > > > > owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org wrote on 16-10-2007 15:14:14: > > > All, > > > > > > The current Verilog-AMS update proposals for chapter 2 and chapter 3 > > > contain duplictae information: the first paragraph of section 3.1.1 > > > is essentially the same as section 2.5.4. Considering that > > > conversion is not a lexical convention I would suggest to remove it > > > from section 2.5.4 and provide the additional examples of conversion > > > in this subsection to section 3.1.1. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Marq > > > > > > -- > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > > believed to be clean. > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. > -- Srikanth Chandrasekaran Design Technology (Tools Development) Freescale Semiconductor Inc. T:+91-120-439 5000 p:x3824 f: x5199 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Mar 5 00:49:38 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 05 2008 - 00:49:41 PST