No it was deliberate. analog initial blocks can only contain the same subset of statements / expressions that are allowed in Analog UDFs. i.e. they can't contain contributions, analog filter functions (ddt,idt, etc.) So that is why analog_function statement is used in this context- but yes it is a little confusing. Maybe the analog_function_statement could be renamed to something more meaningful to both analog UDF's and initial blocks, but I can't think of anything - perhaps analog_independent_statement ? Dave Geoffrey.Coram wrote: > Page 89 (106 of PDF): > > analog initial analog_function statement > > I think "analog_function" was accidentally copied. > > -Geoffrey > -- ===================================== -- David Miller -- Design Technology (Austin) -- Freescale Semiconductor -- Ph : 512 996-7377 Fax: x7755 ===================================== -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Mar 28 08:59:53 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 28 2008 - 08:59:58 PDT