Ah, well, then the second underscore is missing; there's a space between analog_function and statement. -Geoffrey David Miller wrote: > No it was deliberate. > analog initial blocks can only contain the same subset of statements / > expressions that are allowed in Analog UDFs. i.e. they can't contain > contributions, analog filter functions (ddt,idt, etc.) > > So that is why analog_function statement is used in this context- but > yes it is a little confusing. Maybe the analog_function_statement could > be renamed to something more meaningful to both analog UDF's and initial > blocks, but I can't think of anything - perhaps > analog_independent_statement ? > > Dave > > Geoffrey.Coram wrote: >> Page 89 (106 of PDF): >> >> analog initial analog_function statement >> >> I think "analog_function" was accidentally copied. >> >> -Geoffrey >> > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Mar 28 09:02:39 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 28 2008 - 09:02:41 PDT