On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 09:32 +0200, Marq Kole wrote: > All, > > In Table 4-19 (p.63) of the LRM 2.2 and Table 4-16 (p.62 of the LRM > 2.3 Draft 3 it is noted that I(n1, n1) will give an error, but no > mention is given on V(n1, n1). I think this should be added for > clarity. > > There are two solutions possible: > - allow it but always return 0; however, no unnamed branch should be > created for this. > - disallow and return an error - this would be similar as what's been > done with I(n1, n1). > > My preference would be for the second option as it would be more > consistent and make it easier to attent users to possible mistakes in > their model. Agreed. Xav -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Apr 3 00:53:52 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 03 2008 - 00:54:00 PDT