Re: Verilog-AMS Committee Meeting - 12 May 2008 (Monday)

From: Graham Helwig <graham.helwig_at_.....>
Date: Sat May 10 2008 - 01:26:53 PDT
Hello Sri and others,

Here is some feedback about draft 4:

Annex D.1 has not semicolon after the discipline and nature names.

Should Annex D.3 (driver_access.vams file) have guard directives like 
disciplines.vams and constant.vams?
 
Regards
Graham

Sri Chandra wrote:
> The draft4-preliminary version has been uploaded:
>
> http://www.eda.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/public-docs/VAMS_v2.3-Draft4-preliminary.pdf 
>
>
> We will review this on Monday evening 7:00am Pacific. I am hoping that 
> this will be the last major draft version before we submit to the 
> board for approval. We will make minor edits based on the review but 
> no new features, enhancements or major corrections. this will have to 
> wait probably till the next version and needs to be captured in 
> Mantis. Hopefully by mid/late next week we can finalize on LRM2.3 
> version.
>
> Please find call times and details:
>
> Date: 12 May 2008 (Monday)
>
> Call-In Details:
> USA Toll Free: 877-346-8823
> USA Toll: +1-203-320-0407
> Passcode: 602538
>
> Call times:
> 07:00am US Pacific
> 09:00am US Central
> 10:00am US Eastern
> 16:00pm Eindhoven
> 19:30pm Noida
> 23:30pm Adelaide
>
> Regards,
> Sri
>
>
> Sri Chandra wrote:
>> Stu,
>>
>> Thanks for getting back immediately. If there aren't any changes to 
>> draft4 then i guess I can put pressure on Accellera to make a press 
>> release (assuming we send it to the board immediately), otherwise we 
>> need to find a different way of publicizing it at DAC.
>>
>>
>> All,
>> So if its okay with everybody I guess we can have a review of that 
>> document tomorrow (May 9th), same time at the various timezones. 
>> Please let me know if there are any concerns otherwise for this week 
>> we will meet on Friday morning pacific time 7:00am. Please consider 
>> this as the agenda reminder. :) If for any reason, Stu is unable to 
>> send the doc, we will meet next week.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sri
>>
>> Stuart Sutherland wrote:
>>> Sri,
>>>
>>> I got side-tracked last week by some unexpected business and some 
>>> family
>>> affairs.  I was not able to work on the editing for draft 4 last 
>>> week, but
>>> started work on it this week.  I expect to have draft 4 completed by 
>>> 5 PM
>>> Pacific time today (Thursday, May 8).
>>>
>>> I would think Accellera could still squeeze in doing a press release 
>>> -- DAC
>>> is still 30 days away, as of today.
>>>
>>> I can be available for a conference call Thursday evening or anytime on
>>> Friday (Pacific time).
>>>
>>> I will be at DAC.
>>>
>>> Stu
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Stuart Sutherland
>>> stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
>>> +1-503-692-0898
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Sri Chandra
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 11:42 PM
>>>> To: Stuart Sutherland; Verilog-AMS LRM Committee
>>>> Subject: Draft 4 version
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stu,
>>>>
>>>> Would you able to give an estimate when this would be ready? I guess
>>>> its
>>>> too late for having a call today, but just wondering whether we can
>>>> have
>>>> a review tomorrow (Friday) if the draft version comes out today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>> I am hoping that we are fairly close to the final version, possibly
>>>> just
>>>> one more revision. I guess we have missed the deadline for DAC press
>>>> release as it requires one month period for Accellera review and
>>>> approval but at least hoping that we could announce at DAC that the
>>>> LRM2.3 has been frozen and sent for board approval.
>>>>
>>>> On this note, is anybody from this committee going to be at DAC? 
>>>> Please
>>>> do send me a note on that.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Sri
>>>> -- 
>>>> Srikanth Chandrasekaran
>>>> Design Technology (Tools Development)
>>>> Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
>>>> T:+91-120-439 5000 p:x3824 f: x5199
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat May 10 01:26:29 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 10 2008 - 01:26:45 PDT