RE: Verilog-AMS Committee Meeting - 12 May 2008 (Monday)

I had also made a note to add the semicolon to all discipline and nature
examples and to Annex D for the "preliminary-2" draft.  Does anyone object?

I didn't catch who volunteered to describe the updates that need to be made
to Annex H, but this change to optionally have a semicolon should be added
to that annex.


Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Geoffrey.Coram
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:24 AM
> To: Graham Helwig
> Cc: Sri Chandra; 'Verilog-AMS LRM Committee'; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
> Subject: Re: Verilog-AMS Committee Meeting - 12 May 2008 (Monday)
> 
> Hmm ... the semicolon can't be required since it wasn't there in
> LRM 2.1 or 2.2.
> 
> In the call, we decided to make it optional in A.1.6
>    nature nature_identifier [ : parent_nature ] [ ; ]
> and A.1.7
>    discipline discipline_identifier [;]
> 
> We did not explicitly say whether to update all the items in
> Annex D.1; it sounds like we want to move towards consistency
> with the other items (module, connect_rules, etc. have the ;)
> so therefore we should add ; to all the natures and
> disciplines, with the understanding that all simulators need
> to update their parsers to handle the new optional semicolon.
> 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.