[Please ignore the minutes I had sent out earlier, pressed the send button bit too soon] Date: 9th July 2009 Attendees: Victor Berman, IEEE Karen Pieper, Accellera Himyanshu Anand, Freescale Muzaffer Kal, DSPIA Dave Miller, Freescale Sri Chandra, Freescale Ian Wilson, Berkeley DA Martin O'Leary, Cadence Marq Kole, NXP Accellera v IEEE discussions: ============================= * Victor Berman, chair for the DASC stds within IEEE, and Karen Pieper Accellera technical chair and SV chair participated in the discussions * There are two proposals at this point - raise two PARs for ASVA and SV-AMS work within IEEE and execute it as independent projects - work with ASVA extensions (and the required Verilog-AMS enhancements and P1800 extensions) under Accellera and donate it at that point. The SV-AMS integration will also happen in parallel and some of the key fundamental issues resolved before donation * Technically both the above approaches are very feasible. Victor mentioned that Accellera will get the approval for copyrights for P1800 document for this work if the committee decides to stay within Accellera for ASVA release. The committee needs to ensure that any enhancements done in P1800 is aligned with the overall SV committee and there is a plan for these enhancements to be included in their next releases. * With regards to concern on lengthy process etc, Victor & Karen clarified that there is not much of a difference in terms of working group execution on regular basis. The process is lengthy only for the actual approval process * For corporate IEEE standards work, Victor clarified that the IEEE charges (approx.) 4000 USD. There has been a change in fee structure where there is a single fee irrespective of number of projects the company is participating (as opposed to the earlier per-project fee structure). For individual standards if you are IEEE member there are no additional fees for voting rights. * Martin felt that it might be better to do the ASVA work and the related extensions to AMS and SV with Accellera and donate it at that point. Given that SV-AMS integration work is happening in parallel, some of the key issues for this integration would have been resolved before the donation. * With regards to cleanup and Verilog-AMS enhancements (multi-power domain support etc), if it is within Accellera the committee can decide whether this gets included as part of the ASVA release or whether an earlier release needs to be done. The next step is to identify feedback from the individuals on the participants of the Verilog-AMS and ASVA technical committees. It will be good to get a poll of your preference, the options being: (a) Execute the ASVA work and related Verilog-AMS enhancements within Accellera and donate to IEEE at the point of releasing ASVA or (b) Donate to IEEE today and raise two PARs to work on these projects If all of you could let me know your preference by July 28th, it will help us make a quick and informed decision. Analysis of Mantis items: ========================= * Started looking at the Mantis items. David posted the list of mantis items before the meeting. Currently going through the mantis items to clean up the database and categorize them appropriately - cleanup (minor issue) - AMS enhancements (extension to Verilog-AMS language) - ASVA extension (requirement to support ASVA work) - SV-AMS integration [Each of the above buckets would be created in Mantis to categorize them appropriately] * The following mantis items were covered in the meeting: - 830: Support for breaking out of loops; break, continue and return are supported in SV however this cannot be support for "analog-for" statements. This will be considered as part of SV-AMS integration - 2806: Direction argument in last crossing not optional. This will be considered as cleanup item (minor) - 2805: Support for both interpolation and synchronization of analog values in digital. This will be addressed as part of ASVA enhancements - 2803: Access to hierarchical port branch syntax disallowed (I(<a1.p>)). This will be addressed as part of the AMS enhancements - 2594: Ambiguity in list_of_ports syntax item definition. This is already addressed in P1800 and will be addressed as part of SV-AMS integration -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Jul 15 02:54:43 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 15 2009 - 02:55:06 PDT