RE: No BNF support for .module_output_variable_identifier

From: Marq Kole <marq.kole_at_.....>
Date: Mon Aug 03 2009 - 02:03:39 PDT
Hi Surya,

This looks like an oversight: an alternative should be added to the third rule in BNF A.9.1 to handle the procedural assignment of a paramset_output_variable_expression. This paramset_output_variable_expression would have to be defined such that it may use the ".module_output_variable_identifier" as primitive.

This issue as well as the one you mentioned on the access function should be made into a Mantis item. If you want I can do that...

Cheers,
Marq


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Surya Pratik Saha
Sent: Monday 3 August 2009 9:56
To: verilog-ams@server.eda.org
Subject: No BNF support for .module_output_variable_identifier

Hi,
In Verilog AMS 2.3.1, section 6.4.3 Paramset output variables, there is
an example of ".module_output_variable_identifier". But I could not see
this in the BNF of paramset. Is it intentional or a oversight of LRM?

-- 
Regards
Surya





-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Aug 3 12:21:48 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 03 2009 - 12:22:05 PDT