Re: No BNF support for .module_output_variable_identifier

Hi Marq,
I have filed Mantis 2836 for this one. I will file mantis for the other one.

Regards
Surya



-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re:No BNF support for .module_output_variable_identifier
From: Marq Kole <marq.kole@nxp.com>
To: Surya Pratik Saha <spsaha@cal.interrasystems.com>, 
verilog-ams@server.eda.org <verilog-ams@eda.org>
Date: Monday, August 03, 2009 2:33:39 PM
> Hi Surya,
>
> This looks like an oversight: an alternative should be added to the third rule in BNF A.9.1 to handle the procedural assignment of a paramset_output_variable_expression. This paramset_output_variable_expression would have to be defined such that it may use the ".module_output_variable_identifier" as primitive.
>
> This issue as well as the one you mentioned on the access function should be made into a Mantis item. If you want I can do that...
>
> Cheers,
> Marq
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Surya Pratik Saha
> Sent: Monday 3 August 2009 9:56
> To: verilog-ams@server.eda.org
> Subject: No BNF support for .module_output_variable_identifier
>
> Hi,
> In Verilog AMS 2.3.1, section 6.4.3 Paramset output variables, there is
> an example of ".module_output_variable_identifier". But I could not see
> this in the BNF of paramset. Is it intentional or a oversight of LRM?
>
>   




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.