Jim, > If this is the Accellera draft that was approved in July > 2006, why isn't it designated as: P1076-2006-D3.0. Basically because I wasn't thinking straight. You're quite right. I've been calling more recent drafts P1076{,c,.1}-2007, but D3.0 is definitely -2006. Sorry to muddy the waters. Cheers, PA -- Dr. Peter J. Ashenden peter@ashenden.com.au Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd. www.ashenden.com.au PO Box 640 VoIP: sip://0871270078@sip.internode.on.net Stirling, SA 5152 Phone (mobile): +61 414 70 9106 Australia > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-isac@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-isac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Jim Lewis > Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 23:55 PM > To: isac@server.eda.org > Subject: Re: ISAC: Minutes from meeting on 12 April 2007 > > > Chuck > In minutes it states: > "We agreed to refer to the draft standard as P1076-2007-D3.0." > > If this is the Accellera draft that was approved in July > 2006, why isn't it designated as: P1076-2006-D3.0. > > A little psychology, I would like to make sure that those > who have not started implementing it yet realize that they > are starting late. > > Regards, > Jim > > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Jim Lewis > Director of Training mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com > SynthWorks Design Inc. http://www.SynthWorks.com > 1-503-590-4787 > > Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Apr 13 19:41:08 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 13 2007 - 19:41:09 PDT