> If this is the Accellera draft that was approved in July > 2006, why isn't it designated as: P1076-2006-D3.0. Reflecting on this over the weekend, I was wondering if we wanted to differentiate between IEEE and Accellera. IEEE uses P1076 for proposed modifications to a standard and 1076 for the standard. Would we want to refer to it as Accellera P1076-2006-D3.0 or would we want to shorten it to A1076-2006-D3.0. In the presentations I have been doing, I have been using Accellera VHDL-2006-D3.0 and will update to the new notation for future presentations. This would also help separate it from IEEE 1076-2007 which has the VHPI extensions, but except for VHPI updates is an older draft of the standard. Cheers, Jim -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jim Lewis Director of Training mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com SynthWorks Design Inc. http://www.SynthWorks.com 1-503-590-4787 Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Apr 16 00:29:46 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 16 2007 - 00:29:49 PDT