ITC Team, There have been a number of good comments related to itc goals, strategies and tactics. I've tried to capture the comments and suggestions as much as possible in the slideset. There seems to be good consensus through slide 14. There seems to be good consensus on slide 15 as well, around interface work. My opinion was that the Zaiq suggestion around clarifying the extent of backwards compatibility had broad consensus support, so I added it to the slideset. We can discuss it further if necessary. That change is on slide 13. The remainder of the slides, starting with slide 16 seems to require some further discussion. I've outlined what I see as the discussion items below. There seems to be a good deal of discussion around slide 16, on activities around modeling constructs. In particular, Aptix has indicated that they do not want ITC do that kind of work. Axis/Verisity/(Cadence?) has indicated that they don't want that work done in ITC or another forum. Axis/Verisity/(Cadence?) proposed compliance assurance activities, so I've added that as a discussion item on slide 17. Mentor also believes that the providing a means of assuring compliance is important and would like to be sure that we go about it in the most expedient, effective and collaborative way. For discussion, I've also added the debug activities suggested by Cadence on slide 18 and left open an Other slide at the end. Duaine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 30 2005 - 15:58:36 PST