Subject: Re: Dynamic/Global Parameters in Verilog-AMS
From: Martin O'Leary (oleary@cadence.com)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:38:02 PST
Dan,
I didn't send this proposal for consideration in the 2.1 LRM
effort.
My understanding of the 2.1 effort should be about cleanup/clarification
which sounds like your understanding too.
I sent it as an FYI because other members of the committee were
wondering how global parameters could be handled in Verilog-AMS
and I resent this proposal because it addressed that issue.
However we do plan to submit it for review by the committee
at some point after the 2.1 LRM has been completed/accepted
when enhancements are again open for consideration,
--Martin
On Mar 7, 3:30pm, Dan FitzPatrick wrote:
> Subject: Re: Dynamic/Global Parameters in Verilog-AMS
>
> i went back and looked at the design objectives and really didn't
> find anything that definitively (closely or otherwise) supported
> a requirement for dynamic parameters for sweeps. section 2.2.1
> only defines a 'must' for supporting time-domain simulation.
>
> i thought we were also only looking at modifications at this time
> and not new proposals?
>
> regards,
>
> --dan
>-- End of excerpt from Dan FitzPatrick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 16:38:04 PST