I wouldn't think so, BUT.. is anything like this ever done (and allowed) in the digital Verilog world? I would use that principle .. if the digital guys already do this then its ok.. If they don't we shouldn't either jbd Jonathan David j.david@ieee.org jb_david@yahoo.com http://ieee-jbdavid.blogspot.com Mobile 408 390 2425 Work: jbdavid@scintera.com http://www.scintera.com 408 200-7024 ----- Original Message ---- From: Dave Miller <David.L.Miller@freescale.com> To: Verilog-AMS LRM Committee <verilog-ams@eda.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 11:13:20 AM Subject: Question regarding connecting individual elements of a vector port Hi all, Is it perfectly valid to have a vector node where some of the elements are connected to ports and others are used as internal nodes? I can't see anything that explicitly restricts it from a syntax point of view, but was wondering if we should disallow it, or leave it intentionally ambiguous so that it is up to individual implementations? The situation I am referring to is this below. module blackbox(in[0]); electrical [0:1] in; analog begin V(in[0]) <+ 5; V(in[1]) <+ 10; end endmodule Here I have two constant voltage sources, where in[0] is used in a port connection, and in[1] is just a local source. Should this be allowed? Dave -- ===================================== -- David Miller -- Design Technology (Austin) -- Freescale Semiconductor -- Ph : 512 996-7377 Fax: x7755 =====================================Received on Tue Oct 24 13:32:25 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 24 2006 - 13:32:29 PDT